工艺方法对水辅助注塑成型短玻纤增强聚丙烯管件 壁厚、耐压性能及玻纤取向的影响
作者:
作者单位:

1.华东交通大学 机电与车辆工程学院,江西 南昌 330013;2.华东交通大学 材料与科学工程学院,江西 南昌 330013

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52303038)


Effects of Processing Methods on Wall Thickness, Pressure Resistance and Glass Fiber Orientation of Short Glass Fiber Reinforced Polypropylene Pipe Fittings by Water-Assisted Injection Molding
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    以短玻纤增强聚丙烯(SGF/PP)为实验材料,采用溢流法水辅助注塑(WAIM-O)、短射法水辅助注塑(WAIM-S)、溢流法水驱动浮芯辅助注塑(WPAIM-O)和水驱动浮芯辅助注塑短射法(WPAIM-S)四种工艺制备圆形管件,通过壁厚测量、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)表征及耐压测试,系统分析工艺对管件残余壁厚、玻纤取向及耐压性能的作用规律,明确宏观性能与微观结构的关联机理。结果表明,浮芯加入可显著优化水辅注塑熔体穿透稳定性,溢流法制品残余壁厚大于短射法,WPAIM工艺残余壁厚小于WAIM工艺;四种工艺中 WPAIM-O 制品壁厚均匀性最优,WAIM-S 最差。SEM 表征显示,WAIM-O 制品玻纤呈无序取向,其余三种工艺制品玻纤多沿流动方向有序排列。耐压测试表明,壁厚、壁厚均匀性及玻纤取向共同调控耐压性能,其中 WAIM-O 制品耐压性能最优(7.3MPa),显著高于 WPAIM-O(5.1MPa),WPAIM-S(4.0MPa)及 WAIM-S(3.3MPa),得出壁厚越厚,均匀性越高且玻纤取向无序程度越强,制品耐压性能越优异。

    Abstract:

    Using short-glass-fiber-reinforced polypropylene (SGF/PP) as the experimental material, circular tubular parts were fabricated by four processes, namely overflow-based water-assisted injection molding (WAIM-O), short-shot water-assisted injection molding (WAIM-S), overflow-based water-penetrated floating-core-assisted injection molding (WPAIM-O), and short-shot water-penetrated floating-core-assisted injection molding (WPAIM-S). Wall-thickness measurement, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) characterization and pressure-resistance tests were performed to systematically investigate how manufacturing processes affect the residual wall thickness, glass-fiber orientation and pressure-bearing performance of tubular parts, and clarify the correlation mechanism between macroscopic properties and microstructures. The results demonstrate that the introduction of a floating?core greatly improves the penetration stability of melt during water?assisted injection molding. Products made by the overflow method possess larger residual wall thickness than those from the short?shot method, and samples prepared via the WPAIM process have thinner residual walls compared with WAIM counterparts. Among the four forming methods, WPAIM-O yields parts with the best wall?thickness uniformity whereas WAIM-S delivers the worst-uniform walls. SEM observations reveal that glass fibers in WAIM-O samples are randomly distributed, while fibers from the other three processes are predominantly aligned along the melt-flow direction. The pressure-resistance testing proves that the wall-thickness level, thickness uniformity and fiber orientation collectively govern the pressure-bearing capacity. Specimens produced by WAIM-O achieve the optimum pressure-resistance property of 7.3?MPa, distinctly surpassing WPAIM-O (5.1?MPa), WPAIM-S (4.0?MPa) and WAIM-S (3.3?MPa). It is concluded that higher wall?thickness, better thickness uniformity and increased randomness of glass-fiber orientation collectively lead to superior pressure-resistance performance of final parts.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-03
  • 录用日期:2026-03-31
  • 网络出版日期:2026-08-19
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
您是第      位访问者
编辑出版 :《高分子材料科学与工程》编辑部
地址 :四川省成都市一环路南一段24号 四川大学高分子研究所
电话 :028-8540 1653  E-mail:gfzclbjb@vip.sina.com
高分子材料科学与工程 ® 2026 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司